Monday, March 16, 2009

Synchronized Chaos Dooms Global Warming

Global Warmists aren't the only ones with fancy computer climate models. We Global Coolists now have our own computer climate model. And it has a cool name - synchronized chaos. A perfect oxymoron for our time (Zis is chaos! Vee don't synchronize here!)

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee climate smart guys used a math application, synchronized chaos, to analyze climate data over the past 100 years. The data indicates Earth's air and ocean systems, which regulate global temperature, are beginning a synchronous stage. In time, "the systems begin to couple and the synchronous state is destroyed, leading to a climate shift." I don't know what that means, but climate shift sounds a lot better than the Global Warmist, "We're all gonna die!"

Dr. Anastasios Tsonis, described as "researcher", said something about synchronized swimming, that if the swimmers weren't doing the same thing at the same time then they weren't synchronized anymore. That may make sense at the Olympics, but we all know synchronized swimming isn't a real sport like golf or bowling, so I don't know why he even brought it up.

Tsonis went on to more lucidly explain,

"In climate, when this happens, the climate state changes. You go from a cooling regime to a warming regime or a warming regime to a cooling regime. This way we were able to explain all the fluctuations in the global temperature trend in the past century. The research team has found the warming trend of the past 30 years has stopped and in fact global temperatures have leveled off since 2001... if we don't understand what is natural, I don't think we can say much about what the humans are doing. So our interest is to understand -- first the natural variability of climate -- and then take it from there. So we were very excited when we realized a lot of changes in the past century from warmer to cooler and then back to warmer were all natural."
So! There you have it -- warmer, cooler; cooler, warmer. Climate fluctuations natural as the seasons, observations filled with education and reason. Sunrise, sunset. Sunrise, sunset. Swiftly flow the days. Seedlings turn overnight to sunflowers, blossoming even as we gaze. Sunrise, sunset. Sunrise, sunset. Swiftly fly the years. One season following another, laden with happiness and tears.

Mazel tov, smart guys at UW-M!! The debate is over. Houston, we have consensus.



See also:
Synchronized Chaos: Mechanisms For Major Climate Shifts
ScienceDaily (Aug. 2, 2007)



The life of Indigo Red is full of adventure. Tune in next time for the Further Adventures of Indigo Red.

1 comment:

Bhuvan Chand said...

Combating climate change may not be a question of who will carry the burden but could instead be a rush for the benefits, according to new economic modeling presented at “Climate Change: Global Risks, Challenges & Decisions” hosted by the University of Copenhagen.

Contrary to current cost models for lowering greenhouse gases emissions and fighting climate change, a group of researchers from the University of Cambridge conclude that even very stringent reductions of can create a macroeconomic benefit, if governments go about it the right way.

“Where many current calculations get it wrong is in the assumption that more stringent measures will necessarily raise the overall cost, especially when there is substantial unemployment and underuse of capacity as there is today”, explains Terry Barker, Director of Cambridge Centre for Climate Change Mitigation Research (4CMR), Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge and a member of the Scientific Steering Committee of the Congress.