Saturday, March 29, 2008

Islamization of Planet Earth: The 1% Threshold

This is purportedly adapted from the book, "Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat" by Dr Peter Hammond. I don't know if that's true. I do know that the 116 page book is not easily found - Amazon has two copies, new and used, at this writing each selling for $108.00. I ripped it off from Jihad Watch, seville834. Whatever the actual source the information has a gut level truth to it.

Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system.

Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The religious component is a beard for all the other components.

Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called "religious rights."

When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agree to "the reasonable" Muslim demands for their "religious rights," they also get the other components under the table. Here’s how it works (percentages source CIA: The World Fact Book, 2007.)

As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:

United States -- Muslim 1.0%
Australia -- Muslim 1.5%
Canada -- Muslim 1.9%
China -- Muslim 1%-2%
Italy -- Muslim 1.5%
Norway -- Muslim 1.8%

At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:

Denmark -- Muslim 2%
Germany -- Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%
Spain -- Muslim 4%
Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.

They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. (United States).

France -- Muslim 8%
Philippines -- Muslim 5%
Sweden -- Muslim 5%
Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris -- car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam --
Mohammed cartoons).

Guyana -- Muslim 10%
India -- Muslim 13.4%
Israel -- Muslim 16%
Kenya -- Muslim 10%
Russia -- Muslim 10-15%

After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:

Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%

At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:

Bosnia -- Muslim 40%
Chad -- Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%

From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:

Albania -- Muslim 70%
Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%
Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%
Sudan -- Muslim 70%

After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:

Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%
Egypt -- Muslim 90%
Gaza -- Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%
Iran -- Muslim 98%
Iraq -- Muslim 97%
Jordan -- Muslim 92%
Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan -- Muslim 97%
Palestine -- Muslim 99%
Syria -- Muslim 90%
Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%
Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of "Dar-es-Salaam" -- the Islamic House of Peace -- there’s supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:

Afghanistan -- Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%
Somalia -- Muslim 100%
Yemen -- Muslim 99.9%

Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then
start killing each other for a variety of reasons.

"Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel. -- Leon Uris,
"The Haj"

It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average would indicate.





The life of Indigo Red is full of adventure. Tune in next time for the Further Adventures of Indigo Red.

Friday, March 28, 2008

The Other Fairness Doctrine






The life of Indigo Red is full of adventure. Tune in next time for the Further Adventures of Indigo Red.

Thursday, March 27, 2008

Black Americans Demand Democrat Party Apologize for Slavery

Barack Obama and the Democrat Party want to open a debate on race in America. There's an old saying that says be careful what you wish for, you just might get it. The Dems are getting the debate and it doesn't seem to be working out the way they intended. Many are pointing to the racist history of the Democrat Party and the civil rights activities of the Republican Party. At long last, history is being set right.

The following letter written by Lt. Col. Frances Rice,U.S. Army Ret., has been reprinted in numerous blogs the last several days. Apparently it was written about June 2004, but it's still timely. Ironically, Rice does not include it on her own blog, Black Republican.

An Open Letter to the Democratic Party
By Lt. Colonel Frances Rice,U.S. Army Retired: Contributor to the LHI

"We, African American citizens of the United States, declare and assert:

Whereas in the early 1600's 20 African men and women were landed in Virginia from a Dutch ship as slaves and from that tiny seed grew the poisoned fruit of plantation slavery which shaped the course of American development,

Whereas reconciliation and healing always begin with an apology and an effort to repay those who have been wronged,

Whereas the Democratic Party has never apologized for their horrific atrocities and racist practices committed against African Americans during the past two hundred years, nor for the residual impact that those atrocities and practices and current soft bigotry of low expectations are having on us today,

Whereas the Democratic Party fought to expand slavery and, after the Civil War, established Jim Crow Laws, Black Codes and other repressive legislation that were designed to disenfranchise African Americans,

Whereas the Ku Klux Klan was the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party, and their primary goal was to intimidate and terrorize African American voters, Republicans who moved South to protect African Americans and any other whites who supported them,

Whereas, according to leading historians (both black and white), the horrific atrocities committed against African Americans during slavery and Reconstruction were financed, sponsored, and promoted by the Democratic Party and their Ku Klux Klan supporters,

Whereas from 1870 to 1930, in an effort to deny African Americans their civil rights and to keep African Americans from voting Republican, thousands of African Americans were shot, beaten, lynched, mutilated, and burned to death by Ku Klux Klan terrorists from the Democratic Party,

Whereas Democratic Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt and Harry Truman rejected anti-lynching laws and efforts to establish a permanent Civil Rights Commission,

Whereas the Democratic party has used racist demagoguery to deceive African Americans about the history of the Republican Party that: (a) started as the anti-slavery party in 1854, (b) fought to free African Americans from slavery, (c) designed Reconstruction, a ten-year period of unprecedented political power for African Americans, (d) passed the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments to the U. S. Constitution granting African Americans freedom, citizenship, and the right to vote, (e) passed the Civil Rights Acts of 1866 and 1875 granting African Americans protection from the Black Codes and prohibiting racial discrimination in public accommodations, (f) passed the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and 1965 granting African Americans protection from the Jim Crow laws, (g) established Affirmative Action programs to help African Americans proper with Republican President Richard Nixon's 1969 Philadelphia Plan that set the first goals and timetables and his 1972 Equal Employment Opportunity Act that made Affirmative Action Programs the law of our nation, and (h) never sponsored or launched a program, passed laws, or engaged in practices that resulted in the death of millions of African Americans,

Whereas Brown vs. the Board of Education of Topeka (a 1954 decision by Chief Justice Earl Warren who was appointed by Republican President Dwight Eisenhower) was a landmark civil rights case that was designed to overturn the racist practices that were established by the Democratic Party,

Whereas after Democratic President Franklin D. Roosevelt received the vote of African Americans, he banned African American newspapers from the military shortly after taking office because he was convinced the newspapers were communists,

Whereas Democratic President John F. Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil Rights Law, opposed the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and was later criticized by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. for ignoring civil rights issues.

Whereas Democratic President John F. Kennedy authorized the FBI (supervised by his brother, Attorney General Robert Kennedy) to investigate Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. on suspicion of being a communist,

Whereas Democratic Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, made a 14-hour filibuster speech in the Senate in June 1964 in an unsuccessful effort to block passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and was heralded in April 2004 by Democratic Senator Christopher Dodd as a senator who would have been a great leader during the Civil War,

Whereas when the 1964 Civil Rights Act came up for vote, Senator Al Gore, Sr. and the rest of the Southern Democrats voted against the bill,

Whereas in the House of Representatives only 61 percent of the Democrats voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act as compared to 80 percent of Republicans, and in the Senate only 69 percent of the Democrats voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act, compared to 82 percent of the Republicans,

Whereas Democratic President Bill Clinton sent troops to Europe to protect the citizens of Bosnia and Kosovo while allowing an estimated 800,000 black Rwandans to be massacred in Africa, vetoed the welfare reform law twice before signing it, and refused to comply with a court order to have shipping companies develop an Affirmative Action Plan,

Whereas Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore created harmful racial division when he falsely claimed that the 2000 presidential election was "stolen" from him and that African Americans in Florida were disenfranchised, even though a second recount of Florida votes by the "Miami Herald" and a consortium of major news organizations confirmed that he lost the election, and a ruling by the U.S. Civil Rights Commission declared that African Americans were not denied the right to vote,

Whereas the Democratic Party's soft bigotry of low expectations and social promotions have consigned African Americans to economic bondage and created a culture of dependency on government social programs,

Whereas the Democratic Party's use of deception and fear to block welfare reform, the faith-based initiative and school choice that would help African Americans prosper is consistent with the Democratic Party's heritage of racism that included sanctioning of slavery and kukluxery, a perversion of moral sentiment among leaders of the Democratic Party whose racist legacy bode ill until this generation of African Americans,

Now, therefore, for the above and other documented atrocities and accumulated wrongs inflicted upon African Americans, we demand a formal written apology and other appropriate remuneration from the leadership of the Democratic party.


Source:
Lincoln Heritage Institute (LHI)
"Anonymous" comment - Reasons For Being a Republican
Free Republic
Gateway Pundit



The life of Indigo Red is full of adventure. Tune in next time for the Further Adventures of Indigo Red.

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Knut the Psycho Bear

Knut, the polar bear formerly known as cuddly and cute, is now described as a "publicity addicted psycho." His handlers say he is addicted to the attention and adulation of the hordes of people who have paid some $10 million to see the 15 month old polar bear cub since his birth in December 2006.

One of Knut's caretakers, Markus Roebke, told reporters yesterday that "Knut needs to leave Berlin Zoo, the sooner the better. He's had so much contact with humans in his young life that he doesn't realize he's a polar bear, he needs to get used to a life without the people who brought him up ... He is addicted to the whole show, the human adulation. It is not healthy ... He actually cries out or whimpers if he sees that there is not a spectator outside his enclosure ready to ooh and aah at him ... When the zoo had to shut because of black ice everywhere he howled until staff members stood before him and calmed him down."

The Berlin Zoo's vet disagrees. Andre Schuele said, "Not so. I can't confirm that at all. Knut is making very good progress, he's growing up just fine, he's a very healthy animal, and everything is really normal."

I don't know if Knut is a psycho or just a lonely adolescent wild animal. I do know that everything is not "really normal." So far the only normal thing about Knut's life was his abandonment by his mother. His sibling died because of maternal neglect. Knut was saved from the normal course of events by anthropomorphising do-gooders.

This Britney Spears life was certainly not what was intended, but it's the only life Knut has now. Polar bears are solitary animals. Putting him into a closed environment with another polar bear is out of the question. Berlin zoologists have a real puzzle to solve: how to get a polar bear cub who thinks he's a human to accept he's a polar bear. Whatever they figure to do, just keep him away from hair clippers.

Sources:
Daily Mail
ABC News



The life of Indigo Red is full of adventure. Tune in next time for the Further Adventures of Indigo Red.

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Reasons for Being a Republican

Photo: U.S. Grant, 1880


General Ulysses S. Grant telegraphed an urgent message to the War Dept during the Civil War: "I will not move my army without onions." The next day, three trainloads of onions were dispatched to the front.


In 1870, President Grant launched an investigation of the Southern organization known as the Ku Klux Klan. A year later, a Grand Jury reported: "There has existed since 1868, in many counties of the state, an organization known as the Ku Klux Klan, or Invisible Empire of the South, which embraces in its membership a large proportion of the white population of every profession and class. The Klan has a constitution and bylaws, which provides, among other things, that each member shall furnish himself with a pistol, a Ku Klux gown and a signal instrument. The operations of the Klan are executed in the night and are invariably directed against members of the Republican Party. The Klan is inflicting summary vengeance on the colored citizens of these citizens by breaking into their houses at the dead of night, dragging them from their beds, torturing them in the most inhuman manner, and in many instances murdering." The Ku Klux Act was passed by Congress on April 20, 1871 effectively destroying the KKK until 1915 when Woodrow Wilson, Democrat, was elected President.

The retired General, former President addressed a Republican gathering in Warren, Ohio on September 28, 1880.

Reasons for Being a Republican

IN view of the known character of the speaker who is to address you to-day, and his long public career, and association with the leading statesmen of this country for the past twenty years, it would not be becoming in me to detain you with many remarks of my own. But it may be proper for me to account to you on the first occasion of my presiding at political meetings for the faith that is in me.

I am a Republican, as the two great political parties are now divided, because the Republican party is a national party seeking the greatest good for the greatest number of citizens. There is not a precinct in this vast nation where a Democrat can not cast his ballot and have it counted as cast. No matter what the prominence of the opposite party, he can proclaim his political opinions, even if he is only one among a thousand, without fear and without proscription on account of his opinions. There are fourteen States, and localities in some other States, where Republicans have not this privilege. This is one reason why I am a Republican.

But I am a Republican for many other reasons. The Republican party assures protection to life and property, the public credit, and the payment of the debts of the government, State, county, or municipality, so far as it can control. The Democratic party does no promise this; if it does, it has broken its promises to the extent of hundreds of millions, as many Northern Democrats can testify to their sorrow. I am a Republican, as between the existing parties, because it fosters the production of the field and farm, and of manufactories, and it encourages the general education of the poor as well as the rich.

The Democratic party discourages all these when in absolute power. The Republican party is a party of progress, and of liberty toward its opponents. It encourages the poor to strive to better their children, to enable them to compete successfully with their more fortunate associates, and, in fine, it secures an entire equality before the law of every citizen, no matter what his race, nationality, or previous condition. It tolerates no privileged class. Every one has the opportunity to make himself all he is capable of.

Ladies and gentlemen, do you believe this can be truthfully said in the greater part of fourteen of the States of this Union to-day which the Democratic party control absolutely? The Republican party is a party of principles; the same principles prevailing wherever it has a foothold.

The Democratic party is united in but one thing, and that is in getting control of the government in all its branches. It is for internal improvement at the expense of the government in one section and against this in another. It favors repudiation of solemn obligations in one section and honest payment of its debts in another, where public opinion will not tolerate any other view. It favors fiat money in one place and good money in another. Finally, it favors the pooling of all issues not favored by the Republicans, to the end that it may secure the one principle upon which the party is a most harmonious unit--namely, getting control of the government in all its branches.

I have been in some part of every State lately in rebellion within the last year. I was most hospitably received at every place where I stopped. My receptions were not by the Union class alone, but by all classes, without distinction. I had a free talk with many who were against me in war, and who have been against the Republican party ever since. They were, in all instances, reasonable men, judging by what they said. I believed then, and believe now, that they sincerely want a break-up in this "Solid South" political condition. They see that it is to their pecuniary interest, as well as to their happiness, that there should be harmony and confidence between all sections. They want to break away from the slavery which binds them to a party name. They want a pretext that enough of them can unite upon to make it respectable. Once started, the Solid South will go as Kukluxism did before, as is so admirably told by
Judge Tourgee in his "Fool's Errand." When the break comes, those who start it will be astonished to find how many of their friends have been in favor of it for a long time, and have only been waiting to see some one take the lead. This desirable solution can only be attained by the defeat, and continued defeat, of the Democratic party as now constituted.

One hundred twenty-eight years ago, Ulysses S. Grant enunciated every reason why I am a Republican today. The pernicious nature of the Democrat Party has not changed one iota in all that time, the goals and means remain the same. As the new kid on the block, the Republican Party still has much of work to do.







The life of Indigo Red is full of adventure. Tune in next time for the Further Adventures of Indigo Red.

Monday, March 24, 2008

Anti-Resolve Statements Embolden Enemy

Proof positive is here. Harvard researchers say "publicly voiced doubts about the U.S. occupation of Iraq have a measurable "emboldenment effect" on insurgents there.

"Periods of intense news media coverage in the United States of criticism about the war, or of polling about public opinion on the conflict, are followed by a small but quantifiable increases in the number of attacks on civilians and U.S. forces in Iraq."


The Emboldenment Effect, the measurable increase in attacks, is more evident in Iraq where access to the internet is greatest. "We find that in periods immediately after a spike in anti-resolve statements, the level of insurgent attacks increases."

Radha Iyengar, the researcher and smart person, tracked insurgent attack data, U.S. media reporting of U.S. politician's "anti-resolve statements," and American public opinion polls about the war up to November 2007. In socially and economically comparable Iraqi provinces, there was an increase of attacks of 7% - 10% immediately after "high-mention weeks." The two weeks leading up to the Nov 2006 elections was one such period.

Peer review suggests this is a strong study that could be made more robust by including "pro-resolve" statements. Anti-resolve statements could encourage the bad guys to step up the attacks in the belief that greater violence hastens the departure of Coalition Forces while pro-resolve statement conceivably could make the enemy angry, frustrated, and likely to strike out more violently .

Judith Apter Klinghoffer, an affiliate professor at Haifa University, and writer of the History News Network blog, Deja Vu, reminds that this study should not be seen in isolation. What applies in Iraq also applies in Israel, Sri Lanka, and Britain. It's not just the U.S. media, but media everywhere "have terror victims blood on its hands. Denial is no longer possible."

She further writes, "Moreover, the same can be said about presidential candidates. Note the rise in attacks before the November 2006 elections as well as the recent pre-election rise. Obama and Clinton should not be permitted to ignore the fact that careless comments will cost the lives of American soldiers."



Sources:
Washington Times
History News Network




The life of Indigo Red is full of adventure. Tune in next time for the Further Adventures of Indigo Red.

Mmmmm, Nutraloaf!

The Vermont Supreme Court heard arguments today in a class action suit brought on behalf of state prison inmates. At question is whether the special diet called nutraloaf is food or a behavioral modification tool, i.e., punishment. Inmates claim that it is punishment and prisoners should first have access to a formal disciplinary processes.

The Vermont inmate, Christopher Williams, 29, who has brought the class action, was convicted for killing two people in a 2006 Essex school shooting. He was served the nutraloaf in prison after assaulting guards and smearing excrement in his cell.

Vermont Corrections Commissioner Rob Hofmann said, "It's commonplace in other states as a way of providing nutrition in a mechanism that dissuades inmates from throwing feces, urine, trays and silverware ... It tends to have the desired outcome."

Attorney Seth Lipshutz from Vermont's Prisoner's Rights office acknowledges the state's interest in behavior modification, but says the nutraloaf diet is punishment, "plain and simple", and calling it something else is "playing with words to get what they want. It's wrong and it's sad ... If it's punishment, you've got to follow the rules. Even in prison you get a little bit of due process."

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 1978 Arkansas case, that a mixture known as 'grue' may, for a few days, be tolerable, but would be intolerably cruel over weeks or months. The Michigan Dept of Corrections used nutraloaf and a federal judge ruled in 1988 that it was punishment. Michigan still administers nutraloaf, but only after due process within the prison disciplinary rules.

Jody Kent, Public Policy Coordinator for the National Prison Project of the American Civil Liberties Union, contends nutraloaf "shouldn't be used as punishment ... even in those circumstances, they have to make sure it won't put at risk their health." (Yeah, that's my main concern!)

Inmates given nutraloaf are not being punished, argued Vermont Assistant Attorney General Kurt Kuehl. Rather, it is an effective tool to protect prison staff and property. Most of the criminals served nutraloaf have used forks, spoons, trays, and cups as weapons or a means to store feces and urine before throwing the waste at correctional officers. The nutraloaf is a nutritionally complete meal served on a piece of kitchen paper. Afterward, the inmate undergoes normal disciplinary action.

"Once the offender relents, we stop with the nutraloaf. That's our goal, to protect our staff and not have them subjected to behavior that the average Vermonter would find incomprehensible," said Hoffman. This leaves the duration completely in the hands of the inmate and may be the difference between the arguments of the Corrections Dept and the inmates.

What does this stuff taste like? Hoffman, who has tried nutraloaf, says it's a bit like zucchini bread. "It reminded me of eating my vegetables, and I'm not necessarily a big fan of vegetables."

How can we this dish for our families and church potlucks? The State of Vermont Agency of Human Services Department of Corrections has provided the official PDF Special Management Meal Recipe dated August 28, 1996, superseding the September 26, 1995 recipe (it was improved.)

INGREDIENTS

a. Six (6) slices Whole Wheat Bread, finely chopped
b. Four (4) ounces Non-dairy Cheese, finely grated
c. Four (4) ounces Raw Carrots, finely grated
d. Twelve (12) ounces Spinach, canned, drained
e. Four (4) ounces Seedless Raisins
f. Two (2) cups Great Northern Beans, cooked and drained
g. Four (4) tablespoons Vegetable Oil
h. Six (6) ounces Tomato Paste
i. Eight(8) ounces Milk, powdered, instant nonfat/skim
j. Six (6) ounces Potato Flakes, dehydrated

PREPARATION

The above mixture will be divided into three (3) loaves, providing one (1) loaf per meal.

Mix all the ingredients together in a 12-quart stainless steel mixing bowl. Make sure all wet items are drained. Ingredients may be kneaded with hands (wearing plastic gloves) or mixed with a spoon. The mixture should be stiff and just moist enough to spread. Form loaf in glazed bread pan. It is suggested that the loaf pan be placed in the oven on a sheet pan containing water. This will help keep the bottom of the loaf from burning. Bake at 325 degrees for approximately 45 minutes, until each loaf reaches an internal temperature of 155 degrees. The loaf will start to pull away from the side of the bread pan when baking is completed.
If that recipe is not up to your tastes or standards, the recipes of Illinois, Washington, and Maryland are provided at Indigo Continuum.

Oh, by the way, Williams has been disciplined occasionally since his first experience with nutraloaf, but not so seriously as to require nutraloaf. "I presume it was effective," Hofmann said.




Sources:
Yahoo News
ABC News
Burlington Free Press
State of Vermont



The life of Indigo Red is full of adventure. Tune in next time for the Further Adventures of Indigo Red.

Sunday, March 23, 2008

Hillary Clinton Used Child as Sniper Shield

Hillary Clinton flew into Tuzla, Bosnia March 25, 1996 under sniper fire. With her were comedian Sinbad, rocker Sheryl Crow, and the 15-year-old first child, Chelsea.

Clinton said at George Washington University in Washington, DC, during an after speech Q&A, "I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base."

In this photo, we see former First Lady Hillary Clinton, grabbing a Bosnian child and shamelessly using her as a shield against the multitude of snipers. Note that First Child Chelsea is strategically positioned to protect the First Lady's left. All this despite the little girl telling Clinton she is happy because there is "peace now."

This from Daily Kos, "The problem is that there was no sniper fire. The ceremony took place on the tarmac. And nobody ran with their heads down to get in to vehicles in fear of being shot." You can fool Kos most of the time, but even Kos can occasionally see a snow job.

Mrs. Clinton may not actually have the experience she claims, but one thing is irrefutable, Mrs. Clinton certainly does have an imagination.


The life of Indigo Red is full of adventure. Tune in next time for the Further Adventures of Indigo Red.