Monday, May 05, 2008

Something Unbelievable This Way Comes

A small miracle has occurred. The Huffington Post has published what was supposed to be an opinion piece by Sam Harris in the Washigton Post, but was declined as "too critical of Islam."

And holy moly is it ever critical of Islam. Harris doesn't spare the reaction of the West, either. The whole essay, Losing Our Spines to Save Our Necks, is must read.

(h/t Atlas Shrugs)
Wilders, like Westergaard and the other Danish cartoonists, has been widely vilified for "seeking to inflame" the Muslim community. Even if this had been his intention, this criticism represents an almost supernatural coincidence of moral blindness and political imprudence. The point is not (and will never be) that some free person spoke, or wrote, or illustrated in such a manner as to inflame the Muslim community. The point is that only the Muslim community is combustible in this way. The controversy over Fitna, like all such controversies, renders one fact about our world especially salient: Muslims appear to be far more concerned about perceived slights to their religion than about the atrocities committed daily in its name. Our accommodation of this psychopathic skewing of priorities has, more and more, taken the form of craven and blinkered acquiescence.

There is an uncanny irony here that many have noticed. The position of the Muslim community in the face of all provocations seems to be: Islam is a religion of peace, and if you say that it isn't, we will kill you. Of course, the truth is often more nuanced, but this is about as nuanced as it ever gets: Islam is a religion of peace, and if you say that it isn't, we peaceful Muslims cannot be held responsible for what our less peaceful brothers and sisters do. When they burn your embassies or kidnap and slaughter your journalists, know that we will hold you primarily responsible and will spend the bulk of our energies criticizing you for "racism" and "Islamophobia."

--snip--

The lesson we should draw from the Fitna controversy is that we need more criticism of Islam, not less. Let it come down in such torrents that not even the most deluded Islamist could conceive of containing it. As Ibn Warraq, author of the revelatory Why I Am Not a Muslim, said in response to recent events:

It is perverse for the western media to lament the lack of an Islamic reformation and willfully ignore works such as Wilders' film, Fitna. How do they think reformation will come about if not with criticism? There is no such right as 'the right not to be offended; indeed, I am deeply offended by the contents of the Koran, with its overt hatred of Christians, Jews, apostates, non-believers, homosexuals but cannot demand its suppression.

It is time we recognized that those who claim the "right not to be offended" have also announced their hatred of civil society.
Could it be that Liberals are coming to their senses, or is it simply that George Bush is leaving office soon and an "oppose Bush at all costs" environment is no longer needed? Is sympathy for the Devil, after 7 years too unseemly to continue?

Whatever. At least Sam Harris has written something I can get behind.



The life of Indigo Red is full of adventure. Tune in next time for the Further Adventures of Indigo Red.

2 comments:

Mike's America said...

"Could it be that Liberals are coming to their senses, or is it simply that George Bush is leaving office soon and an "oppose Bush at all costs" environment is no longer needed?"

Are those the only two options?

Indigo Red said...

No, no, of course not. There's always the possibilty it is only a brain fart that will quickly fade.