Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Reasons for Being a Republican

Photo: U.S. Grant, 1880

General Ulysses S. Grant telegraphed an urgent message to the War Dept during the Civil War: "I will not move my army without onions." The next day, three trainloads of onions were dispatched to the front.

In 1870, President Grant launched an investigation of the Southern organization known as the Ku Klux Klan. A year later, a Grand Jury reported: "There has existed since 1868, in many counties of the state, an organization known as the Ku Klux Klan, or Invisible Empire of the South, which embraces in its membership a large proportion of the white population of every profession and class. The Klan has a constitution and bylaws, which provides, among other things, that each member shall furnish himself with a pistol, a Ku Klux gown and a signal instrument. The operations of the Klan are executed in the night and are invariably directed against members of the Republican Party. The Klan is inflicting summary vengeance on the colored citizens of these citizens by breaking into their houses at the dead of night, dragging them from their beds, torturing them in the most inhuman manner, and in many instances murdering." The Ku Klux Act was passed by Congress on April 20, 1871 effectively destroying the KKK until 1915 when Woodrow Wilson, Democrat, was elected President.

The retired General, former President addressed a Republican gathering in Warren, Ohio on September 28, 1880.

Reasons for Being a Republican

IN view of the known character of the speaker who is to address you to-day, and his long public career, and association with the leading statesmen of this country for the past twenty years, it would not be becoming in me to detain you with many remarks of my own. But it may be proper for me to account to you on the first occasion of my presiding at political meetings for the faith that is in me.

I am a Republican, as the two great political parties are now divided, because the Republican party is a national party seeking the greatest good for the greatest number of citizens. There is not a precinct in this vast nation where a Democrat can not cast his ballot and have it counted as cast. No matter what the prominence of the opposite party, he can proclaim his political opinions, even if he is only one among a thousand, without fear and without proscription on account of his opinions. There are fourteen States, and localities in some other States, where Republicans have not this privilege. This is one reason why I am a Republican.

But I am a Republican for many other reasons. The Republican party assures protection to life and property, the public credit, and the payment of the debts of the government, State, county, or municipality, so far as it can control. The Democratic party does no promise this; if it does, it has broken its promises to the extent of hundreds of millions, as many Northern Democrats can testify to their sorrow. I am a Republican, as between the existing parties, because it fosters the production of the field and farm, and of manufactories, and it encourages the general education of the poor as well as the rich.

The Democratic party discourages all these when in absolute power. The Republican party is a party of progress, and of liberty toward its opponents. It encourages the poor to strive to better their children, to enable them to compete successfully with their more fortunate associates, and, in fine, it secures an entire equality before the law of every citizen, no matter what his race, nationality, or previous condition. It tolerates no privileged class. Every one has the opportunity to make himself all he is capable of.

Ladies and gentlemen, do you believe this can be truthfully said in the greater part of fourteen of the States of this Union to-day which the Democratic party control absolutely? The Republican party is a party of principles; the same principles prevailing wherever it has a foothold.

The Democratic party is united in but one thing, and that is in getting control of the government in all its branches. It is for internal improvement at the expense of the government in one section and against this in another. It favors repudiation of solemn obligations in one section and honest payment of its debts in another, where public opinion will not tolerate any other view. It favors fiat money in one place and good money in another. Finally, it favors the pooling of all issues not favored by the Republicans, to the end that it may secure the one principle upon which the party is a most harmonious unit--namely, getting control of the government in all its branches.

I have been in some part of every State lately in rebellion within the last year. I was most hospitably received at every place where I stopped. My receptions were not by the Union class alone, but by all classes, without distinction. I had a free talk with many who were against me in war, and who have been against the Republican party ever since. They were, in all instances, reasonable men, judging by what they said. I believed then, and believe now, that they sincerely want a break-up in this "Solid South" political condition. They see that it is to their pecuniary interest, as well as to their happiness, that there should be harmony and confidence between all sections. They want to break away from the slavery which binds them to a party name. They want a pretext that enough of them can unite upon to make it respectable. Once started, the Solid South will go as Kukluxism did before, as is so admirably told by
Judge Tourgee in his "Fool's Errand." When the break comes, those who start it will be astonished to find how many of their friends have been in favor of it for a long time, and have only been waiting to see some one take the lead. This desirable solution can only be attained by the defeat, and continued defeat, of the Democratic party as now constituted.

One hundred twenty-eight years ago, Ulysses S. Grant enunciated every reason why I am a Republican today. The pernicious nature of the Democrat Party has not changed one iota in all that time, the goals and means remain the same. As the new kid on the block, the Republican Party still has much of work to do.

The life of Indigo Red is full of adventure. Tune in next time for the Further Adventures of Indigo Red.


Gayle said...

Excellent, Indigo! Yep, we sure do have a lot of work to do. *sigh*

My folks were Democrats, so I thought I was too. Jimmy Carter happily changed all that and got me interested in politics, so I guess the peanut farmer was good for something. :)

By the way, I don't know if I got over here in time to wish you a Happy Easter, so I'm belatedly wishing you a HAPPY EASTER!

Mike H. said...

We need to clean up our party too, witness Duke Cunningham et al. It's irritating to be coming down on the progs and have to justify that which can't be justified.

They have Jefferson and Hastings and James McGovern who need to go and we're spending our time on Cunningham and Foley et al. Not good.

Indigo Red said...

Mike, Grant had his problems as President, too. His brother was stealing government supplies meant for the Indians on reservations and selling the stolen goods at great profit. Most of the Indian agents under Grant were crooks as investigations proved.

What Grant was getting at here was the basic ground level difference between the two parties. What I was getting at was that after 128 years, those same differences still hold. Had I lived in 1880 rather than now, I would have been a Republican then, too.

We will always have crooks in government. It was no different under the Roman Republic. Politicians, in general, are sycophants, liars, and crooks. The intent of the party, the philosophy of the group creates the great divide between people.

I believe in the general political principles laid out by Pres. Grant. I do not agree with the general political principles as expressed by Jimmy Carter, Clinton, Obama, Dean, or anyone else in the Democrat Party. Beyond the Declaration of Independence, I don't share much with Tom Jefferson anymore, either. Individual policy decisions and requirements, well, that's an entirely different matter.

What I've been looking for is a statement of principles of the two great parties. From the Republicans one can find many expressions of the bedrock philosophy and they are surprisingly similar over the decades and between individuals. The principles of the Democrat party are harder to come by and when found, may not agree with anything else expressing those ideals.

In short, Republicans have consistant principles; the Democrats have only one - more taxes.

Anonymous said...

Hey Red I posted under anonymous regarding your Black History Quiz and the A/B answer trouble. Thought I would direct you to this. Reads like the Lt Col took your quiz.

Mike H. said...

Indigo, I have no intention of changing my philosophical outlook, but I think that we need to be cognizant of all factors that affect us as a party.

Indigo Red said...

Then you can't be in my party! Out, out, damned spot! Unless you brought the beer, in which case, party on.